Comments on: 1 John 5:1, Regeneration, Faith, and Tradition Driven Eisegesis http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:52:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: smartwarlord http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2620 smartwarlord Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:12:23 +0000 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2620 <b>Excellent video Dr. ...</b> <br> Excellent video Dr. White, I hope you enjoyed your trip to the UK. God Bless. Excellent video Dr. …
Excellent video Dr. White, I hope you enjoyed your trip to the UK.

God Bless.

]]> By: charli33lm3r http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2621 charli33lm3r Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:12:23 +0000 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2621 <b>Here is a classic ...</b> <br> Here is a classic example of circular reasoning, we have chosen these texts because they all appear to agree and they must agree because we have chosen them. We can't just admit that Johannian thinking might be slightly different than Pauline thinking. And why can't this be? Because they are both canonical and therefore must agree. It's interesting how 1st Cent. Christians can all be inspired and even manage to agree on minute points of Theology, but Christians today can't agree on anything. Here is a classic …
Here is a classic example of circular reasoning, we have chosen these texts because they all appear to agree and they must agree because we have chosen them. We can’t just admit that Johannian thinking might be slightly different than Pauline thinking. And why can’t this be? Because they are both canonical and therefore must agree. It’s interesting how 1st Cent. Christians can all be inspired and even manage to agree on minute points of Theology, but Christians today can’t agree on anything.

]]> By: Enterprise2700 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2619 Enterprise2700 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:12:22 +0000 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2619 <b>@charli33lm3r I ...</b> <br> @charli33lm3r I would say that the underlying theology of the New Testament must be in agreement b/c its true author is God himself. However, since God worked through human agents, individual peculiarities would shine through (i.e., John's approach to the Truth would be different than Paul's approach to the Truth, but the Truth they are both proclaiming is the same). The differences between John and Paul are evident, but there are no differences in the Truth they both teach. @charli33lm3r

I …
@charli33lm3r

I would say that the underlying theology of the New Testament must be in agreement b/c its true author is God himself. However, since God worked through human agents, individual peculiarities would shine through (i.e., John’s approach to the Truth would be different than Paul’s approach to the Truth, but the Truth they are both proclaiming is the same). The differences between John and Paul are evident, but there are no differences in the Truth they both teach.

]]> By: skalapunk http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2616 skalapunk Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:12:21 +0000 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2616 <b>"YHWH saves and is ...</b> <br> "YHWH saves and is not dependent upon his creation to save. " That's very calvinistic :) “YHWH saves and is …
“YHWH saves and is not dependent upon his creation to save. ”

That’s very calvinistic :)

]]> By: topbon2ndvalve http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2617 topbon2ndvalve Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:12:21 +0000 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2617 <b>I wish I'd known ...</b> <br> I wish I'd known you were in London Dr. White, is there any way we can scrutinise your itinerary in advance (so as not to miss your speaking engagements)? I wish I’d known …
I wish I’d known you were in London Dr. White, is there any way we can scrutinise your itinerary in advance (so as not to miss your speaking engagements)?

]]> By: LuxAuterna http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2618 LuxAuterna Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:12:21 +0000 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2618 <b>I'm not a Calvinist ...</b> <br> I'm not a Calvinist but I do have to say that your reasoning and the theology on these subjects from Calvinism are undeniable. YHWH saves and is not dependent upon his creation to save. I’m not a Calvinist …
I’m not a Calvinist but I do have to say that your reasoning and the theology on these subjects from Calvinism are undeniable. YHWH saves and is not dependent upon his creation to save.

]]> By: AgApE010 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2614 AgApE010 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:12:20 +0000 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2614 <b>Dr White, would you ...</b> <br> Dr White, would you mind doing a video addressing the text in Revelation 22:18-19 and how it is used by Arminians and Catholics to argue for a loss of salvation? Also a commentary on Justin Martyr's supposed belief in baptismal regeneration would be greatly appreciated, especially since you did so well addressing the other passage from Justin Martyr's writings in your video. Thank you for your ministry here and God bless! Dr White, would you …
Dr White, would you mind doing a video addressing the text in Revelation 22:18-19 and how it is used by Arminians and Catholics to argue for a loss of salvation?

Also a commentary on Justin Martyr’s supposed belief in baptismal regeneration would be greatly appreciated, especially since you did so well addressing the other passage from Justin Martyr’s writings in your video.

Thank you for your ministry here and God bless!

]]> By: gnanner1 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2615 gnanner1 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:12:20 +0000 http://www.buildingontradition.org/tradition/1-john-51-regeneration-faith-and-tradition-driven-eisegesis#comment-2615 <b>Excellent video, ...</b> <br> Excellent video, James. I took notes. Excellent video, …
Excellent video, James. I took notes.

]]>